Inheritance with plain old data structs


Interfaces are defined by their functionality and not by the data they contain. This, I find, makes mimicking C++ style inheritance difficult for Plain Old Data (POD) classes. The only solution I can think of is to implement a method that does nothing for all struct that implement the interface. Consider the below example with "fooSignatureMove"

package main

type foo interface{
   // fooSignatureMove does nothing but allow to mimick inheritence

type A struct{}
type B struct{}
type C struct{}

func (*A) fooSignatureMove(){}
func (*B) fooSignatureMove(){}

func main(){
  arr := make([]foo, 2)
  arr[0] = &A{}
  arr[1] = &B{}
  arr[2] = &C{} // I do not want this to compile

Is this good practice?


As @mkopriva explained in a comment, this pattern is indeed quite common in the standard library, so it is probably the way to go. See for example ast.Expr and exprNode

Answered By – Remi.b

Answer Checked By – Timothy Miller (GoLangFix Admin)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.